A single fake 1-star review costs the average Canadian small business between C$4,200 and C$11,000 in lost customers before it is dealt with. We remove fake, defamatory, and policy-breaking Google reviews using the amended Competition Act, provincial defamation law, and Google's official channels. C$599 per removed review, billed only after the review is gone. Zero upfront cost, zero risk.
Zero upfront cost · 24-hour eligibility answer · Bilingual EN/FR filing

The Google Maps three-dot report button is free and open to every Canadian business. It also removes reviews at about one in eight tries. The gap is not the button, it is the evidence, the appeal, and the escalation lever behind it.
| What you compare | DIY self-flag | BGR-managed removal |
|---|---|---|
| First-pass removal rate | 13.1% | 48% (CA, 2025–26 log, 604 cases) |
| Median time to decision | 18 days (self-flag) | 4.3 days (Business Redressal Form + evidence) |
| Appeal follow-through | None | Second and third submissions with fresh evidence |
| Legal escalation | Not available | Ontario Libel & Slander Act notice, Quebec CCQ 1457 route |
| Cost if unsuccessful | Your time | C$0 — invoice only after removal is confirmed |
Until 2022 the Competition Bureau treated fake reviews as low priority. Three bills and a Bureau digest later, Canadian removal work looks nothing like it did in 2021.
Bill C-19 receives royal assent, first Competition Act amendments broadening deceptive-marketing scope.
Bill C-56 tightens abuse-of-dominance provisions used against coordinated fake-review campaigns.
Bill C-59 royal assent, private access to the Competition Tribunal for deceptive-marketing complaints from 20 Jun 2025.
Private-access provisions live. Businesses can now file directly for reviews that misrepresent a material fact.
Competition Bureau publishes updated Deceptive Marketing Practices Digest, chapter 4 explicitly covers fake online reviews.
Canada has no federal defamation code. The same 1-star review can survive in one province and fall in another. Below are the five where most of our 2025–26 provincial escalations sit.
| Province | Governing law | What it changes about a filing |
|---|---|---|
| Ontario | Libel and Slander Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.12 | Written pre-suit notice under s.5(1) is mandatory within 6 weeks of the review coming to your attention. Miss the window and the claim is barred. |
| Quebec | Code civil du Québec, art. 1457 (extra-contractual liability) | No pre-suit notice required. Fault, damage, and causation are the three elements; opinion is protected but false factual statements are actionable. |
| British Columbia | Libel and Slander Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 263 | PPPA 2019 (Protection of Public Participation Act) is BC's anti-SLAPP statute; weak filings can be dismissed with costs against the business. |
| Alberta | Defamation Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. D-7 | One-year limitation from publication. Discovery rules on republication (each fresh view of the same URL) are contested; we file early. |
| Nova Scotia | Defamation Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 122 | Recent Rothesay Corp. v. Wilson line requires evidence of actual harm for corporate plaintiffs; screenshots and revenue delta are the standard proof file. |
Sources: provincial statute texts as at March 2026; Competition Bureau Deceptive Marketing Practices Digest, Q1 2026. Not legal advice.
The Canadian Google queue mirrors the US one on policy but deprioritises profiles that repeatedly file low-evidence reports. Filing on protected content lowers removal rates on your legitimate cases for months.
No black-box promises. Every step is verifiable from your own Google Business Profile dashboard, and every fee is triggered after removal.
You send review URLs. We map each one to a specific Google policy clause, a Competition Act s.74.01 provision, or a provincial defamation threshold. Cases that do not clear one of those doors are declined in writing before you pay.
We file through Google's Business Redressal Form in English or French depending on your province, with policy citation, reviewer pattern data, and screenshots. Median first response in the Canadian queue: 4.3 days.
First-pass denials are common on borderline cases. Our Canadian resubmission rate is 71%, always with fresh evidence. Second-pass removal rate: 32%, climbing to 48% with three attachments.
Ontario cases get a Libel & Slander Act s.5 notice inside the 6-week window. Quebec cases go via CCQ 1457. BC cases screen for PPPA anti-SLAPP exposure before we file. We only use this channel on qualifying facts.
Live-link screenshot and your dashboard verification. Billing at C$599 per removed review, after removal is confirmed, never before.
Real files from the last twelve months, identifying details removed. Every outcome is the actual outcome, including the one that only partly worked.
Reviewer alleged an incorrect diagnosis they had never actually received; the clinic proved no such patient file existed. Removed on second-pass Redressal filing in 11 days. Provincial escalation not needed.
9 reviews from accounts posting within a 40-minute window, all created that week. Filed under Competition Act deceptive-marketing plus Google spam policy. All 9 removed in 17 days. Article 1457 route held in reserve.
Ex-employee posted 4 negative reviews after a wage claim. Two removed under conflict-of-interest policy; two stayed live because they described real service failings. Honest reporting on what could and could not be removed.
No retainer, no per-attempt charge, no monthly minimum. We tell you within 24 hours whether the case clears policy, Competition Act, or provincial defamation thresholds. If we take it and fail, you owe nothing.
Sibling pages and background reading from the BGR Review team.
Pricing, process, and every category we handle across Canada and worldwide.
How FTC 16 CFR §465 and state defamation variance change the US route.
DMCC Act 2024 and Defamation Act 2013 filings for UK businesses.