Expert coverage of online reputation, review removal, and AI search. Original research and practitioner-led guides on the topics that protect and build business reputations worldwide.
Named-employee defamation removes at 69% on Google's Legal Removal Request and 4% on the BRF. Here's the exact channel test, evidence bundle, and jurisdiction-specific notary/attorney requirements.
Review extortion — 'pay me or the 1-star stays' — removes at 82% first-pass when documented correctly. Here's the exact evidence chain, the right channel, and what to do before you pay anyone.
OSINT and public signals identify roughly 68% of anonymous reviewers. For the remaining 32%, a properly-drafted subpoena to Google via a Doe lawsuit is the only path. Here is the workflow, the pleading standard and the response timeline Google actually follows.
ABA Model Rule 1.6 makes it a bar-ethics violation for an attorney to publicly confirm someone as a client — even to refute a fake review. Attorneys need a different playbook. Here is the ethics-compliant framework with real removal rates.
Reputation management for lawyers in 2026: the five-platform stack, the ABA Model Rule 1.6 response playbook, the 4.4 conversion floor, and the removal escalation path for unlawful reviews.
More stories shipping every week.
← Back home